Research and accountability

How we research, review, and correct Tenet resources.

TrueMadeAI publishes practical K-12 AI governance resources and commercial information about Tenet. This page explains how we separate evidence, interpretation, and product claims.

Last reviewed August 12, 2026

01

Source standard

We prefer original authorities for claims about laws, agency guidance, standards, public programs, and vendor capabilities. Those sources can include statutes, regulations, official agency publications, technical documentation, and current provider terms. Secondary sources may add context, but they should not replace the controlling or original source when one is available.

  • Legal resources distinguish binding law from agency guidance, proposed measures, and local policy.
  • Product resources name the supported surface, content path, device environment, configuration, and known limitation when those details affect a claim.
  • Citations link to the source used so readers can verify the claim and check for later changes.

Our resources are educational information, not legal advice. Districts should verify current requirements with qualified legal, privacy, security, instructional, and accessibility reviewers.

02

Review roles

The TrueMadeAI Editorial Team researches, drafts, cites, and maintains general resources. TrueMadeAI Engineering reviews technical descriptions of Tenet, product boundaries, architecture, and supported behavior. An engineering review is not a legal opinion.

A named person appears as the author only when that person is explicitly credited for the resource. Team bylines identify the responsible TrueMadeAI function, not an unnamed individual or outside reviewer. When a resource lists a review scope, that scope explains what the named team checked.

03

Dates and product status

Published
The date the resource first became public.
Reviewed
The date its sources and material claims were last checked for the stated review scope.
Updated
The date of a material revision after publication, when different from the review date.

Tenet coverage can change when an AI provider changes its interface or when a district changes configuration. Current product claims should be read with the dated supported-products capability matrix. We distinguish generally available Tenet Edge controls from the Tenet Gateway founding-district program and from illustrative architecture or demo traces.

04

Corrections and material changes

Send a suspected factual error, broken source, outdated requirement, or product-coverage issue to support@truemadeai.com. Include the page, the statement at issue, and an authoritative source when possible.

We verify the report against the best available evidence. When a correction changes the practical meaning of a resource, we update its reviewed or updated date and may add a concise change note. Minor spelling, formatting, and link repairs may be made without a separate change note.

05

Commercial context

TrueMadeAI builds and sells Tenet. Product pages are commercial materials, and some resources explain problems that Tenet is designed to address. Readers should evaluate our claims against the cited sources, the dated capability matrix, the applicable agreement, and their own district requirements.

We do not treat a citation, structured-data label, internal review, or product demonstration as proof that every deployment meets every legal or operational requirement. Scope, configuration, provider terms, district policy, and implementation evidence still matter.